This is an archive of a past election.
See http://www.smartvoter.org/ca/sba/ for current information.
SMARTVOTER® by the League of Women Voters of California Education Fund LWV
providing personalized comprehensive unbiased voter information any time you want it.
California
Smart Voter
Santa Barbara County Ballot

2105 LAGUNA ST, 93101

See Also:   Information for the County of Santa Barbara
(Elections Office, local League of Women Voters, links to other county election sites)

November 6, 2018 Election

--------
County Results as of Dec 5 4:48pm, 100.00% of Precincts Reporting (263/263)
72.5% Countywide Voter Turnout (157697/217417)
Statewide Results as of Dec 17 8:57am, 100.0% of Precincts Reporting (24312/24312)
64.5% Statewide Voter Turnout (12,712,542/19,696,371)

State | United States Senator | United States Representative | Member of the State Assembly | Judicial | School | City | District | State Propositions | Local Measures
Click on Name of Contest below.
Polling Location on November 6, 7am - 8pm

First Presbyterian Church
Christian Fellowship Center
21 E Constance Ave
Santa Barbara, CA 93105-3513

[Poll data last updated 2018/10/10 21:01]
Showing a polling place for this address does not mean that you are registered to vote.
Vote-by-Mail ballots may be returned to a worker at any of the  polling places within your county on election day.
Precinct 22-2240B
Ballot Type 19
  • FAQs about Voting and this ballot page
  • How we got this information
  • Report problems or errors

  • State

    GovernorClick here for more info on this contest including known links to other sites

    • Gavin Newsom, Democratic
      7,721,410 votes 61.9%
    • John H. Cox, Republican
      4,742,825 votes 38.1%

    Lieutenant GovernorClick here for more info on this contest including known links to other sites

    • Eleni Kounalakis, Democratic
      5,914,068 votes 56.6%
    • Ed Hernandez, Democratic
      4,543,863 votes 43.4%

    Secretary of StateClick here for more info on this contest including known links to other sites

    • Alex Padilla, Democratic
      7,909,521 votes 64.5%
    • Mark P. Meuser, Republican
      4,362,545 votes 35.5%

    ControllerClick here for more info on this contest including known links to other sites

    • Betty T. Yee, Democratic
      8,013,067 votes 65.5%
    • Konstantinos Roditis, Republican
      4,229,480 votes 34.5%

    TreasurerClick here for more info on this contest including known links to other sites

    • Fiona Ma, Democratic
      7,825,587 votes 64.1%
    • Greg Conlon, Republican
      4,376,816 votes 35.9%

    Attorney GeneralClick here for more info on this contest including known links to other sites

    • Xavier Becerra, Democratic
      7,790,743 votes 63.6%
    • Steven C. Bailey, Republican
      4,465,587 votes 36.4%

    Insurance CommissionerClick here for more info on this contest including known links to other sites

    • Ricardo Lara, Democratic
      6,186,039 votes 52.9%
    • Steve Poizner, No Party Preference
      5,515,293 votes 47.1%

    State Board of Equalization; District 2Click here for more info on this contest including known links to other sites

    • Malia Cohen, Democratic
      2,482,171 votes 72.8%
    • Mark Burns, Republican
      927,949 votes 27.2%

    United States Senator

    United States SenatorClick here for more info on this contest including known links to other sites

    • Dianne Feinstein, Democratic
      6,019,422 votes 54.2%
    • Kevin De León, Democratic
      5,093,942 votes 45.8%

    United States Representative

    United States Representative; District 24Click here for more info on this contest including known links to other sites

    • Salud Carbajal, Democratic
      166,550 votes 58.6%
    • Justin Fareed, Republican
      117,881 votes 41.4%

    Member of the State Assembly

    Member of the State Assembly; District 37Click here for more info on this contest including known links to other sites

    • S. Monique Limón, Democratic
      129,535 votes 80.4%
    • David L. Norrdin, Democratic
      31,522 votes 19.6%

    Judicial

    California Supreme CourtClick here for more info on this contest including known links to other sites (Yes/No)

    • Leondra R. Kruger
      72.8% Yes (6,698,643) 27.2% No (2,506,418)
    • Carol A. Corrigan
      69.8% Yes (6,539,085) 30.2% No (2,833,205)

    Justice, California State Court of Appeal; District 2, Division 1Click here for more info on this contest including known links to other sites (Yes/No)

    • Helen Bendix
      77.4% Yes (2,018,052) 22.6% No (590,706)
    • Victoria G. Chaney
      72.2% Yes (1,894,428) 27.8% No (731,245)

    Justice, California State Court of Appeal; District 2, Division 2Click here for more info on this contest including known links to other sites (Yes/No)

    • Victoria M. Chavez
      74.5% Yes (1,920,874) 25.5% No (658,028)
    • Elwood Lui
      69.5% Yes (1,807,891) 30.5% No (795,048)

    Justice, California State Court of Appeal; District 2, Division 3Click here for more info on this contest including known links to other sites (Yes/No)

    • Anne H. Egerton
      72.9% Yes (1,854,021) 27.1% No (688,207)
    • Luis A. Lavin
      71.9% Yes (1,823,743) 28.1% No (713,749)
    • Halim Dhanidina
      66.4% Yes (1,680,033) 33.6% No (848,475)

    Justice, California State Court of Appeal; District 2, Division 4Click here for more info on this contest including known links to other sites (Yes/No)

    • Nora M. Manella
      78.3% Yes (1,993,585) 21.7% No (551,067)
    • Thomas Willhite
      62.9% Yes (1,575,948) 37.1% No (930,026)

    Justice, California State Court of Appeal; District 2, Division 5Click here for more info on this contest including known links to other sites (Yes/No)

    • Dorothy C. Kim
      74.1% Yes (1,883,381) 25.9% No (657,320)
    • Lamar W. Baker
      71.6% Yes (1,767,943) 28.4% No (700,169)
    • Carl H. Moor
      69.6% Yes (1,737,723) 30.4% No (759,942)

    Justice, California State Court of Appeal; District 2, Division 6Click here for more info on this contest including known links to other sites (Yes/No)

    • Arthur Gilbert
      70.9% Yes (1,755,957) 29.1% No (721,126)
    • Martin J. Tangeman
      69.2% Yes (1,709,960) 30.8% No (760,905)

    Justice, California State Court of Appeal; District 2, Division 7Click here for more info on this contest including known links to other sites (Yes/No)

    • Gail R. Feuer
      71.8% Yes (1,794,035) 28.2% No (705,141)
    • John L. Segal
      70.4% Yes (1,748,106) 29.6% No (734,000)

    Justice, California State Court of Appeal; District 2, Division 8Click here for more info on this contest including known links to other sites (Yes/No)

    • Tricia A. Bigelow
      73.1% Yes (1,829,916) 26.9% No (673,772)

    School

    State Superintendent of Public InstructionClick here for more info on this contest including known links to other sites

    • Tony K. Thurmond
      5,385,912 votes 50.9%
    • Marshall Tuck
      5,198,738 votes 49.1%

    Trustee; Santa Barbara Community College District; Trustee Area 5Click here for more info on this contest including known links to other sites

    • Marsha Croninger
      7257 votes 59.97%
    • Darcel Elliott
      4710 votes 38.92%
    • (135 Total Other Write-In Votes 1.12%)

    Board Member; Santa Barbara Unified School DistrictClick here for more info on this contest including known links to other sites (2 Elected)

    • Kate Ford
      29538 votes 23.53%
    • Rose Muñoz
      23992 votes 19.11%
    • Mark Alvarado
      18235 votes 14.53%
    • Ismael Paredes Ulloa
      17684 votes 14.09%
    • Jill Rivera
      12056 votes 9.61%
    • Bonnie B. Raisin
      9411 votes 7.50%
    • Ricardo Sisto Cota
      9067 votes 7.22%
    • Jim Gribble
      5114 votes 4.07%
    • (420 Total Other Write-In Votes 0.33%)

    State Propositions

    Proposition 1 Authorizes Bonds to Fund Specified Housing Assistance Programs
    Pass: 6,751,018 / 56.2% Yes votes ...... 5,258,157 / 43.8% No votes
    Authorizes $4 billion in general obligation bonds for existing affordable housing programs for low-income residents, veterans, farmworkers, manufactured and mobile homes, infill, and transit-oriented housing. Fiscal Impact: Increased state costs to repay bonds averaging about $170 million annually over the next 35 years.

    Proposition 2 Authorizes Bonds to Fund Existing Housing Program for Individuals with Mental Illness
    Pass: 7,662,528 / 63.4% Yes votes ...... 4,417,327 / 36.6% No votes
    Amends Mental Health Services Act to fund No Place Like Home Program, which finances housing for individuals with mental illness. Ratifies existing law establishing the No Place Like Home Program. Fiscal Impact: Allows the state to use up to $140 million per year of county mental health funds to repay up to $2 billion in bonds. These bonds would fund housing for those with mental illness who are homeless.

    Proposition 3 Authorizes Bonds To Fund Projects for Water Supply and Quality, Watershed, Fish, Wildlife, Water Conveyance, and Groundwater Sustainability and Storage
    Fail: 5,879,836 / 49.3% Yes votes ...... 6,034,991 / 50.7% No votes
    Authorizes $8.877 billion in state general obligation bonds for various infrastructure projects. Fiscal Impact: Increased state costs to repay bonds averaging $430 million per year over 40 years. Local government savings for water-related projects, likely averaging a couple hundred million dollars annually over the next few decades.

    Proposition 4 Authorizes Bonds Funding Construction at Hospitals Providing Children's Health Care
    Pass: 7,551,298 / 62.7% Yes votes ...... 4,494,143 / 37.3% No votes
    Authorizes $1.5 billion in bonds, to be repaid from state's General Fund, to fund grants for construction, expansion, renovation, and equipping of qualifying children's hospitals. Fiscal Impact: Increased state costs to repay bonds averaging about $80 million annually over the next 35 years.

    Proposition 5 Changes Requirements For Certain Property Owners to Transfer Their Property Tax Base to Replacement Property
    Fail: 4,813,251 / 40.2% Yes votes ...... 7,152,993 / 59.8% No votes
    Removes certain transfer requirements for homeowners over 55, severely disabled homeowners, and contaminated or disaster-destroyed property. Fiscal Impact: Schools and local governments each would lose over $100 million in annual property taxes early on, growing to about $1 billion per year. Similar increase in state costs to backfill school property tax losses.

    Proposition 6 Eliminates Certain Road Repair and Transportation Funding. Requires Certain Fuel Taxes and Vehicle Fees Be Approved By the Electorate
    Fail: 5,283,222 / 43.2% Yes votes ...... 6,952,081 / 56.8% No votes
    Repeals a 2017 transportation law's taxes and fees designated for road repairs and public transportation. Fiscal Impact: Reduced ongoing revenues of $5.1 billion from state fuel and vehicle taxes that mainly would have paid for highway and road maintenance and repairs, as well as transit programs.

    Proposition 7 Confirms California Daylight Saving Time to Federal Law. Allows Legislature to Change Daylight Saving Time Period
    Pass: 7,167,315 / 59.7% Yes votes ...... 4,828,564 / 40.3% No votes
    Gives Legislature ability to change daylight saving time period by two-thirds vote, if changes are consistent with federal law. Fiscal Impact: This measure has no direct fiscal effect because changes to daylight saving time would depend on future actions by the Legislature and potentially the federal government.

    Proposition 8 Regulates Amounts Outpatient Kindney Dialysis Clinics Charge For Dialysis Treatment
    Fail: 4,845,264 / 40.1% Yes votes ...... 7,247,917 / 59.9% No votes
    Requires rebates and penalties if charges exceed limit. Requires annual reporting to the state. Prohibits clinics from refusing to treat patients based on payment source. Fiscal Impact: Overall annual effect on state and local governments ranging from net positive impact in the low tens of millions of dollars to net negative impact in the tens of millions of dollars.

    Proposition 10 Expands Local Governments' Authority to Enact Rent Control
    Fail: 4,949,543 / 40.6% Yes votes ...... 7,251,443 / 59.4% No votes
    Repeals state law that currently restricts the scope of rent-control policies that cities and other local jurisdictions may impose on residential property. Fiscal Impact: Potential net reduction in state and local revenues of tens of millions of dollars per year in the long term. Depending on actions by local communities, revenue losses could be less or considerably more.

    Proposition 11 Requires Private-Sector Emergency Ambulance Employees to Remain On-Call During Work Breaks. Eliminates Certain Employer Liability
    Pass: 7,181,116 / 59.6% Yes votes ...... 4,861,831 / 40.4% No votes
    Law entitling hourly employees to breaks without being on-call would not apply to private-sector ambulance employees. Fiscal Impact: Likely fiscal benefit to local governments (in the form of lower costs and higher revenues), potentially in the tens of millions of dollars each year.

    Proposition 12 Establishes New Standards For Confinement of Specified Farm Animals; Bans Sale of Noncomplying Products
    Pass: 7,551,434 / 62.7% Yes votes ...... 4,499,702 / 37.3% No votes
    Establishes minimum requirements for confining certain farm animals. Prohibits sales of meat and egg products from animals confined in noncomplying manner. Fiscal Impact: Potential decrease in state income tax revenues from farm businesses, likely not more than several million dollars annually. State costs up to $10 million annually to enforce the measure.

    Local Measures

    Measure B2018 Charter Amendment - Even-Numbered Year Elections -- City of Santa Barbara (Majority Approval Required)
    Pass: 23227 / 70.78% Yes votes ...... 9588 / 29.22% No votes
    Shall the City Charter be amended to require City general elections to be held in even-numbered years instead of odd-numbered years?

    Measure C2018 Charter Amendment - District Elections -- City of Santa Barbara (Majority Approval Required)
    Pass: 23775 / 75.64% Yes votes ...... 7657 / 24.36% No votes
    Shall the City Charter be amended to reflect the City's court-ordered switch to district elections, with six Council districts and the Mayor elected citywide, and including new special election requirements for Council and Mayoral vacancies?

    Measure G2018 Citizens' Independent Redistricting Commission -- County of Santa Barbara (Majority Approval Required)
    Pass: 73331 / 53.58% Yes votes ...... 63532 / 46.42% No votes
    ORDINANCE TO CREATE A COUNTY OF SANTA BARBARA CITIZENS' INDEPENDENT REDISTRICTING COMMISSION Shall the ordinance of the Board of Supervisors to create an eleven-member independent redistricting commission to adjust the boundaries of the County supervisorial districts by adding Section 2-10.9A to the Santa Barbara County Code be adopted?

    Measure H2018 Independent Redistricting Commission -- County of Santa Barbara (Majority Approval Required)
    Fail: 43903 / 33.06% Yes votes ...... 88901 / 66.94% No votes
    INITIATIVE TO CREATE A COUNTY OF SANTA BARBARA INDEPENDENT REDISTRICTING COMMISSION Shall the measure adding Section 2-10.91 to the Santa Barbara County Code to create an Independent Redistricting Commission to adjust the boundaries of the supervisorial districts be adopted?

    The order of the contests and candidates on this ballot representation is NOT necessarily the same as your county's official ballot.
    If you print and mark your choices on this page and take it to the polls instead of an official sample ballot, be very careful.


    Home || Santa Barbara Home Page || About Smart Voter || Feedback || Donate to Us
    Data Created: February 13, 2019 13:51 PST
    Smart Voter <http://www.smartvoter.org/>
    Copyright © League of Women Voters of California Education Fund   http://cavotes.org
    The League of Women Voters neither supports nor opposes candidates for public office or political parties.