This is an archive of a past election. See http://www.smartvoter.org/ca/state/ for current information. |
League of Women Voters of California Education Fund
| ||||
| ||||
Estes A. "Al" Phillips, III
|
||||
|
The questions were prepared by the League of Women Voters of California Education Fund and asked of all candidates for this office.
Read the answers from all candidates (who have responded).Questions & Answers
1. How will you prioritize the budget choices the Legislature must make to align the state’s income and spending?
As an elected state assembly member the budget is the biggest priority. The budget must be audited and departments need to be evaluated to determine where there is duplication. Those duplicating agencies should be consolidated and individual departments budgets need to be closely scrutinized. Education and public safety should always be first on an elected official's agenda. Conservatives have found up to 4.4 billion dollars of wasteful and duplicate spending, as well as new revenue, in the existing budget that could be utilized to fully fund schools without raising our taxes.2. What types of changes or reforms, if any, do you think are important to make our state government function more effectively?
We need to restructure and reform the pension for public employees. Our existing system is completely unsustainable and I believe that the state legislature should approve the Governors 12-point plan for pension reform. In addition our state needs to focus on the reduction of burdensome regulations that are crippling jobs. California has been ranked the least favorite to start or expand a business. The state should be offering tax incentives for companies staying or expanding in the state. In addition we need to have an honest conversation on means to have people to become self-sufficient. Our entitlement system should be not be used as a safety net for many, unless they are truly in need. It should not be allowed to become a person's way of life. Pride in a job well done and a dollar honestly earned goes a lot further in building our economy and our way of life.3. Fees for public higher education have gone up dramatically and funding has been cut. Is this a priority concern, and if so, what measures would you propose to address it?
Schools, teachers and our public education system are always used as a tool to increase taxes, yet these taxes never seem to go back to the schools! Every year, budgets are cut further and education costs go higher. We need to re-evaluate our government spending and decide that we cannot continue to use our education system as a pawn for our budget woes. We have money in the budget that can be taken from other programs to fully fund education without additional tuition hikes and new taxes. It is time review the duplication and waste in the budget and fully fund our schools by balancing the budget within our current means.4. What other major issues do you think the Legislature must address? What are your own priorities?
We must address the mass exodus of businesses leaving the state. We should foster an environment that would encourage business to relocate, expand and grow here in California. This could be done with a series of expedited permit processes and environmental Impact reports. We also need to provide our youth that choose not to go to college with more trade school options. As older tradesmen retire there needs to be an influx of fresh, newly skilled laborers to take their places.
Responses to questions asked of each candidate are reproduced as submitted to the League. Candidates' statements are presented as submitted. References to opponents are not permitted.Read the answers from all candidates (who have responded).
Candidate Page || Feedback to Candidate || This Contest
SmartVoter Home (Ballot Lookup) || About Smart Voter
Created from information supplied by the candidate: May 30, 2012 22:06
Smart Voter <http://www.smartvoter.org/>
Copyright © League of Women Voters of California Education Fund http://www.lwvc.org
The League of Women Voters neither supports nor opposes candidates for public office or political parties.