This is an archive of a past election.
See http://www.smartvoter.org/oh/hm/ for current information.
Hamilton County, OH November 8, 2011 Election
Smart Voter

Cincinnati's Tax Budget

By Wayne Lippert

Candidate for Council Member; City of Cincinnati

This information is provided by the candidate
This was my response to a proposal by the administration to raise the property tax to the maximum allowable rate
On Monday, Cincinnati City Council held a public hearing before the Budget and Finance Committee to adopt an annual tax budget. The committee considered three versions of the budget: the first would raise the property tax millage rate to the maximum allowable 6.1 mills; the second would raise the millage rate to 5.51 to maintain the annual funding amount; and the third preserves the current rate of 4.6 mills. As you know, housing values have declined in most parts of the city providing less revenue for the same millage rate, which has forced the Administration to act given the loss of revenue. I opposed raising the millage rate because I believe this will help force structural change in our city government.

Rather than accepting the recommendation of the Administration to raise the millage to the maximum amount without scrutiny, we should take this opportunity to look at our city's operations and decide whether this is truly necessary. We should not continue to give our city government more money when it has shown that it cannot responsibly manage the tax dollars that it already has. City Hall needs to fundamentally change the way it operates by cutting unnecessary programs, streamlining operations and consolidating duplicative agencies with the county while allowing the private sector to take over services that it can provide more efficiently and effectively.

As the city's revenue has declined in recent years, instead of thoroughly examining our government to find innovative efficiencies, some on council have continually recommended that we pile fees and taxes upon our citizens. I will not punish the taxpayers for the city's inability to get its fiscal house in order.

It is true that previous councils have set the precedent of adjusting the millage rate to ensure that the city receives the same amount of revenue from property taxes, but I believe giving more revenue to City Hall is akin to giving drugs to a drug addict. Some argue that given the current economic situation in our county, the City should make sure it does not cut revenue until the economy has fully recovered. But raising the millage to maintain the same level of tax revenue is a problem because it relies on future councils to reduce the millage level when property values recover. We know how difficult it is to achieve consensus at the city, and I do not trust future councils to do this.

I will continue to oppose any proposal to raise taxes because City Council's inability to produce a structurally balanced budget should not be corrected by increasing the tax burden on the already overtaxed residents who choose to live in the city. We do not have a revenue problem in Cincinnati. We have a spending problem, and I will be leading the way on City Council to make the difficult decisions that will allow us to structurally balance our budget without punishing the taxpayers.

Next Page: Position Paper 2

Candidate Page || Feedback to Candidate || This Contest
November 2011 Home (Ballot Lookup) || About Smart Voter


oh/hm Created from information supplied by the candidate: September 29, 2011 16:50
Smart Voter <http://www.smartvoter.org/>
Copyright © League of Women Voters of California Education Fund.
The League of Women Voters neither supports nor opposes candidates for public office or political parties.