League of Women Voters of California Education Fund
	Santa Clara County, CA June 8, 2010 Election
	Candidates Answer Questions on the Issues Judge - Superior Court; County of Santa Clara; Office 19

The questions were prepared by the Leagues of Women Voters of Santa Clara County and asked of all candidates for this office.     See below for questions on Sentencing, Experience, Bias Click on a name for candidate information.   See also more information about this contest. 1. As a judge, you may be called on to impose sentences for crimes ranging from misdemeanors to homicide. While there are sentencing parameters and guidelines, you will have latitude. What factors and principles/values will affect your decisions? Answer from Julia Alloggiamento: As a Deputy District Attorney for the past twelve years, my experience of serving as the sole lead attorney prosecuting thousands of cases, ranging from misdemeanors to homicide, would give me the proper framework to fairly evaluate the cases before me. I would be guided by the same principles I have followed as a prosecutor - that the role of the criminal justice system is to seek the truth, apply consequences appropriate to the crime committed, and protect victims and the community from violence and serious criminal conduct. I would follow the laws and the guidelines that are given to judges, including considering the nature of the crime, the criminal history of the defendant, and the risk of future criminal conduct in evaluating the proper sentence for any defendant before the court. I recognize the importance of rehabilitation for non-violent drug offenders and juveniles, as well as the need to provide resources to youth to keep them from entering the juvenile justice system altogether. I would impose sentences in a fair and equal manner for all individuals coming before the court, just as I have prosecuted cases fairly and equally for over a decade. Answer from Bob Camors: I understand the importance of keeping our community safe. I will take into consideration all of the factors in aggravation and mitigation that the court must evaluate including the seriousness or violent nature of the crime as well as the nature, seriousness and age of any prior criminal convictions, the age and circumstances of defendant and other relevant matters brought before me. I will also consider the victim. I will be thinking about saftey of other potential future victims. 2. Please describe your experience in civil and criminal cases. Answer from Julia Alloggiamento: I have extensive legal experience in both civil and criminal cases. For the last 12 years, I have prosecuted thousands of serious and violent criminals including career criminals and domestic violence abusers. I have been the sole lead trial attorney on over 40 trials, ranging from misdemeanors to homicide, and I have never lost a jury trial. I have handled cases at all phases of a criminal case, including issuing (charging the case), negotiating cases at pre-trial, conducting preliminary examinations, writing and responding to motions, serving as trial counsel, and conducting sentencing hearings. I am knowledgeable of the complex issues that can arise in criminal cases, where the court must balance the rights and needs of victims with a defendant's due process rights. Prior to becoming a Deputy District Attorney, I litigated complex civil matters at Morrison & Foerster in both state and federal court. My areas of practice included matters involving financial institutions, real estate, consumer class action, and intellectual property. My experience included conducting direct examination of an expert witness in federal court; preparing witnesses for trial; participating in a five-week international extradition trial in federal court; conducting oral argument in federal court, state court, and before discovery referees; participating in mediation resulting in settlement; taking and defending depositions (including expert depositions); researching and drafting pleadings, motions, and briefs at trial and appellate stages; propounding and responding to all forms of discovery; acting as liaison to media; and conducting intake on potential new clients. In addition, a large portion of my practice was devoted to pro bono matters, resulting in me receiving the Wiley M. Manuel Award for pro bono legal services. Immediately out of law school, I was chosen for the prestigious position of Law Clerk to the Honorable William D. Keller in Federal District Court in the Central District of California. As a Law Clerk, I researched matters, drafted bench memoranda, and wrote opinions for the Court. Answer from Bob Camors: Rising from associate to partner in a major law firm during the last 20+ years, I served as the lead attorney in over two hundred civil cases, including over ten very complex high technology civil cases. During that same time, I was also a team member or a co-lead trial attorney in dozens of other complex civil cases. As lead or co-lead attorney, I have typically done the jury selection, made the opening statement and closing argument and have presented the direct testimony of all client witnesses and the key expert witnesses. There is no task in the preparation or trial of a civil case that I have not personally performed with success on multiple occasions. I have also successfully argued at the Court of Appeals. My criminal law and criminal trial experience is limited to the criminal cases that I investigated and referred to courts martial or handled with non-judicial punishment while serving as an Army officer and the criminal law and criminal procedure classes I took while in law school. 3. Would you propose any changes to assure that there is no appearance of bias in the courtroom including, but not limited to, bias based on disability, gender identity, age, race, religion, ethnicity, or sexual orientation? Answer from Julia Alloggiamento: It is imperative that the judiciary apply justice equally to all individuals who come before the Court. Judges need to avoid acting in any manner that suggests bias or impropriety. As a judge, I would be fair, impartial, and apply justice equally and without bias. Our justice system must provide access to all members of our community, with recognition not only of language barriers but of cultural barriers that may make individuals feel that they are not being treated fairly or with respect. Having worked in the community for the last several years, I have been directly involved in the issues faced by individuals who will appear before me, both as victims and as defendants. This experience will enable me to recognize issues in court and address them with understanding. In addition, I truly believe that a diverse bench with women, minorities, and men all being represented as members of the judiciary helps those individuals coming before the Court feel comfortable that our judiciary is an accurate reflection of our society. Answer from Bob Camors: As a judge, I will be fair and unbiased. My endorsement by the Bar Association's Rainbow Committee demonstrates their confidence in my ability to establish and maintain a bias-free courtroom. I will treat everyone with dignity and respect. I will assure equal justice for all. Responses to questions asked of each candidate are reproduced as submitted to the League.  Candidates' responses are not edited or corrected by the League. The order of the candidates is random and changes daily. Candidates who did not respond are not listed on this page.