This is an archive of a past election. See http://www.smartvoter.org/pa/state/ for current information. |
Dauphin, Schuylkill, Lebanon, Berks, Perry Counties, PA | May 18, 2010 Election |
National Debt - National Security ThreatBy Frank RyanCandidate for US Representative; District 17; Republican Party | |
This information is provided by the candidate |
The greatest national security threat to the United States is our national debt.The greatest national security threat to the United States is our national debt. A determined enemy could bring us to our knees without firing a shot. Just as President Reagan helped bring down the Russian empire in a classic economic chess game in the 1980's, the United States faces a similar risk in 2010 and beyond. Since 1997, the national debt has climbed from $5.4 Trillion to almost 12.6 Trillion as of March 11th, 2010, an increase of $7.1 Trillion. The Congress has authorized an increase in the national debt ceiling to $14 Trillion in order to finance record budget shortfalls in the current fiscal year. Additionally, the White House estimates that federal debt will exceed $19 Trillion by 2015. Household and corporate debt in the United States are increasing as well. Household debt service coverage is almost 20% of disposable income. Corporate debt levels are equally high and troubling with some calling the leveraging of the corporate balance sheet a potential disaster. Against the backdrop of higher corporate debt is the deleveraging of the banking industry to keep banks well capitalized as a result of staggering defaults and the mark to market accounting fiasco. The massive federal, state, corporate and household debt creates an opportunity for an enemy of the United States to dictate our national policy and engage in a successful economic conflict with us. The enemy would merely need to stop funding our insatiable appetite for funds. By withholding funding, either costs for interest would increase or federal programs would have to be curtailed. Unfortunately, at the very beginning of such a conflict our nation has already depleted our economic arsenals. Our country is effectively almost out of ammunition, albeit economic bullets but a weaponless arsenal just the same. Our federal mandates are so extensive that discretionary spending cannot be curtailed sufficiently should a determined enemy wish to engage us on the field of economic battle. Our reckless spending and the interest on the debt have the United States in a predicament. Our nation has virtually checkmated itself.
To reduce the likelihood of such an economic catastrophe, our nation must act quickly to reduce spending, curtail runaway government sponsored pension plans, and make paying down the debt of the United States a national priority. As Milton Friedman said in Capitalism and Freedom (Chicago, 1962, 75-76; 84): "Ever since the New Deal, a primary excuse for the expansion of governmental activity at the federal level has been the supposed necessity for government spending to eliminate unemployment. ... This view has been thoroughly discredited by theoretical analysis, and even more by actual experience..." Friedman concludes that the arguments deployed for fiscal stimulus are "part of economic mythology, not the demonstrated conclusions of economic analysis or quantitative studies." (http://www.coordinationproblem.org/2010/02/friedman-on-fiscal-policy.html) Until the federal government returns to the authority defined for it in the U. S. Constitution Article 1, Section 8 and further refined in the 9th and 10th Amendments to the Constitution, we are likely to be vulnerable to an economic attack. If we act now, the decision is ours. If our nation waits, the decision is theirs. |
Next Page:
Position Paper 3
Candidate Page
|| Feedback to Candidate
|| This Contest
May 2010 Home (Ballot Lookup)
|| About Smart Voter
pa/state
Created from information supplied by the candidate: May 3, 2010 18:14
Smart Voter <http://www.smartvoter.org/>
Copyright ©
League of Women Voters of California Education Fund.
The League of Women Voters neither supports nor
opposes candidates for public office or political parties.