- Establishes in state constitution a system of independent public community college districts and
Board of Governors.
- Generally, requires minimum levels of state funding for school districts and community college
districts to be calculated separately, using different criteria and separately appropriated.
- Allocates 10.46 percent of current Proposition 98 school funding maintenance factor to community
colleges.
- Sets community college fees at $15/unit per semester; limits future fee increases.
- Provides formula for allocation by Legislature to community college districts that would not
otherwise receive general fund revenues through community college apportionment.
Increased state spending on K-14 education from 2007-08
through 2009-10 averaging about $300 million annually,
with unknown impacts annually thereafter. Potential loss in
community college student fee revenues of about $70 million
annually.
- A YES vote on this measure means:
- The existing formula that
establishes a minimum
funding level for K-12
schools and community
colleges would be replaced
with separate formulas for
each system. Community
college fees would be reduced
from $20 per unit to $15 per
unit, and various changes
would be made to the state level
community college
governing board.
- A NO vote on this measure means:
- Existing
laws regarding community
college funding, fees, and
governance would be
unchanged.
- Summary of Arguments FOR Proposition 92:
- Proposition 92
doesn't raise taxes. It
lowers community college
fees to $15 per unit, limits
future fee increases, and
stabilizes funding. When
the Legislature doubled
community college fees,
305,000 fewer Californians
enrolled. Wages for students
who earn a community
college vocational degree
jump from $25,600 to
$47,571 in three years.
See also full Arguments and Rebuttals
- Summary of Arguments AGAINST Proposition 92:
- 92 isn't what it seems.
It locks huge new
spending into California's
Constitution with no way to
pay for it, which could result
in new taxes or cuts to critical
programs, including K-12
schools. It contains no
accountability and no
guarantee funds will reach
college classrooms. No on 92.
See also full Arguments and Rebuttals
- Contact FOR Proposition 92:
- Scott Lay
Yes on Proposition 92
2017 O Street
Sacramento, CA 95811
(916) 444-8641
admin@prop92yes.com
http://www.prop92yes.com
- Contact AGAINST Proposition 92:
- Californians for Fair
Education Funding,
No on Proposition 92
3001 Douglas Blvd. #225
Roseville, CA 95661
(916) 218-6640
info@noprop92.org
http://www.noprop92.org
|
|
No Spin Information
League of Women Voters
Other Nonpartisan Sources
Events
KQED/FM (SF Public Radio)
KPCC 89.3 (Southern CA Public Radio)
Video Voter Minutes
League of Women Voters Video of Pros & Cons
Official Information
Secretary of State
Campaign Finance Data
California Voter Foundation
Secretary of State
- Cal-Access
- how much money is being raised and spent on Prop 92
News and Analysis
Google News Search
Message to News Reporters
- If you use our website for your research, please encourage your readers to go to smartvoter.org!
This election is archived. Any links to sources outside of Smart Voter may no longer be active. No further links will be added to this page.
|
Links to sources outside of Smart Voter are provided for information only and do not imply endorsement.
|