This is an archive of a past election.
See http://www.smartvoter.org/ca/sm/ for current information.
San Mateo County, CA November 8, 2005 Election
Smart Voter

Why I Oppose Non-Academic / Medical Counselors at Middle Schools

By W Charles "Charles" Perry

Candidate for Board Member; San Mateo-Foster City School District

This information is provided by the candidate
I oppose the hiring of non-academic / medical counselrs at middle schools because we have sufficient academic counselors, we have no state mandate or funding for non-academic / medical couselors, and I do not want the schools providing medical psychiatric or psychological care without direct parental involvement and consent, without properly licensed professionals on staff, and without common consent on what defines good mental health.
First, the district's schools currently have sufficient academic counselors. There are 5 counselors for 4 middle schools. Each counselor attends to academic / affective counseling, scheduling, IEP preparation, testing, and responding to student and parent concerns. The district has one counselor who performs similar functions for the elementary schools. The district has 6 psychologists who evaluate students for special educational needs. Expelled students receive mandatory counseling from outside counselors. And every student is taught social responsibility.

Second, regardless of the perceived need of such services or how popular such services are or might be with parents, students, and teachers, the district does not have the resources provide medical-related psychiatric or psychological counseling for troubled teens. Psychiatric and psychological care is a medical issue + not an academic issue + and is not funded by the state. Once started, such a service quickly becomes an entitlement and, hence, virtually impossible to stop. Medical costs are increasing at roughly 10% per year while funding increases at roughly 3% per year. Providing such services would come from an already under-funded general fund to the overall academic detriment of the roughly 10,000 students in the district. The district worked diligently for the last four years to stop encroachments into the general fund and ensure that every program functions within the constraints of its funding. When many schools went bankrupt or fell under state control, our district did not even though it is one of the lowest funded districts in the county and + in comparison to the cost of living + in the nation. We cannot succumb to the temptation to engage in profligate behavior even when it is "for the good of the children."

Third, psychiatric and psychological care of teens is the responsibility of their parents and the health care community. I do not want a state institution making medical decisions or defining what constitutes medical health in troubled teens. I especially do not want this done absent parental consent and direct involvement. Even more so, I do not want this done by unlicensed and untrained academic counselors and teachers.

Next Page: Position Paper 2

Candidate Page || Feedback to Candidate || This Contest
November 2005 Home (Ballot Lookup) || About Smart Voter


ca/sm Created from information supplied by the candidate: November 4, 2005 15:56
Smart Voter <http://www.smartvoter.org/>
Copyright © League of Women Voters of California Education Fund.
The League of Women Voters neither supports nor opposes candidates for public office or political parties.