This is an archive of a past election.
See http://www.smartvoter.org/ca/scl/ for current information.
LWV League of Women Voters of California Education Fund
Santa Clara County, CA November 2, 2004 Election
Smart Voter Political Philosophy for Rhoda Bress

Candidate for
Board Member; Gilroy Unified School District

[photo]
This information is provided by the candidate

My top concerns as a Gilroy School District Parent are:

  • ACADEMIC EXCELLENCE

Academic excellence is more than just one of my issues. It is my vision for the Gilroy Unified School District and for all public school systems.

I am committed to the virtues of a public school education but not to a system that provides a second-rate education. Academic standards in public schools should be as rigorous as those in private schools, and students who attend public schools should not be at an educational disadvantage.

I believe that the role of a school district is to focus on strong academic programs and to provide equal opportunities for excellence and rigor so that all students may reach their full potential.

  • HIGHEST CLASSROOM STANDARDS

The foundation of my candidacy is the School District's need to provide an academically rigorous program for all Gilroy students. This means setting the highest standards for all aspects of the classroom experience and prioritizing the District's resources, both human and monetary, to achieve those standards.

This vision encompasses:

  • Curriculum

  • Instructional Materials

  • Teachers

  • Employee Evaluation

  • Teacher Support

  • Student Preparedness and Conduct

  • Parent Support and Input

  • Academic Culture

  • TEACHER SUPPORT

Teachers are one of the most dedicated and hard-working groups of people. They strive everyday to educate our children and are truly the heart and soul of our school system. I do not believe that the District gives them the support, supplies, and materials they need to do their job, nor does it treat them with the respect that their professional expertise warrants.

Teachers are given a pitiful amount of money to buy necessary supplies and materials. At Gilroy High School, for example, every teacher is given $50 to buy supplies for the entire year. Classrooms are often overcrowded, and instructional materials outdated or inadequate. The District expects our teachers to produce a superior product with mediocre tools.

The District has firmly placed the blame for low student achievement on the teachers' shoulders. I believe that this practice is unfair. All those involved in the educational process must be held equally accountable in order for true reform to happen.

Teachers are responsible for teaching their subject matter to their students.

Students are responsible for completing homework, attending class, behaving appropriately and paying close attention during instructional time.

Parents are responsible for communicating problems their children may be having to teachers, providing proper nutrition, supplying their children with school materials, creating a proper studying environment, ensuring homework is completed, and seeking out help if their students are struggling.

Administrators are responsible for communications to the student and parent community. Their schedule must be prioritized so that they are spending more time on the classroom experience and less time on committees and task forces removed from students and their needs.

School Board Trustees are ultimately responsible for the quality of education our District delivers. They must develop and implement the highest standards for our classrooms and always represent the community, not the administration, in the decision-making process.

  • RESPONSIVENESS TO COMMUNITY

One of the motivating factors behind my candidacy is the serious gap I have observed between parents' expectations of a public school education and what is ultimately being delivered.

Outspoken parents and teachers are reluctant to voice their complaints because their thoughts have been ignored for so long, and because District leaders would rather make these individuals feel like outsiders rather than listen to their ideas. As a result, many families are sending their children to private schools and neighboring public schools. Over the years I have heard the opinion expressed by many district leaders that only well-to-do parents of high-achieving students are choosing these options. I have since found out that this is a myth. I am hearing from many parents of children with a wide range of abilities; they are holding down multiple jobs and taking out mortgages on their homes in order to avoid the public school experience.

Parents are not the only dissatisfied customers. Local businessmen and realtors site the School District's poor reputation as a major deterrent for people choosing to buy homes or accepting employment in the area.

In the 2002 Reality Check study - an annual report issued by Public Agenda and Education Week to track the nation's progress in raising academic standards in the public schools - employers and college professors gave graduating seniors fair or poor grades in writing, grammar, basic math, and work habits. The sad conclusion is that no one can assume a public high school degree means that a student is prepared for the job market or for higher education.

  • RESPONSIBLE RESOURCE ALLOCATION

Once the highest standards have been set for the classroom experience, the School Board must prioritize the District's resources to ensure that those standards are fully implemented and that the needs of the students are put first.

Public school education is one of the few enterprises that receives payment, in the form of tax dollars, but then doesn't deliver the product that the customer ordered. When customers, the parents and students, report that the product is broken, they are often told that the problem is not with the product but with them. I hope to rectify this lack of accountability by delivering to students and parents the education they expect when tax dollars are used for public schools.

Next Page: Additional Endorsements

Candidate Page || Feedback to Candidate || This Contest
November 2004 Home (Ballot Lookup) || About Smart Voter


The League of Women Voters does not support or oppose any candidate or political party.
Created from information supplied by the candidate: October 27, 2004 15:20
Smart Voter   <http://www.smartvoter.org/>
Copyright © League of Women Voters of California Education Fund   http://ca.lwv.org