This is an archive of a past election.
See http://www.smartvoter.org/oh/hm/ for current information.
LWV League of Women Voters of Ohio Education Fund

Smart Voter
Hamilton County, OH March 2, 2004 Election
Candidates Answer Questions on the Issues
Commissioner; County of Hamilton; 4 Year Term Starting 1/2/05; Republican Party


The questions were prepared by the League of Women Voters of the Cincinnati Area and asked of all candidates for this office.

See below for questions on Qualifications, Top Priority

Click on a name for other candidate information.   See also more information about this contest.


1. What are your qualifications for office?

Answer from David E. Grossmann:

The only candidate in the race with any previous adminstrative experience in county government. Former Judge Grossmann administered a 600+ employee agency as Juvenile Court Judge for 23 years.

Former Judge Grossmann is also the only candidate in this race to have ever won countywide office, a critical qualification of a primary candidate.

Answer from Chris Monzel:

As an engineer, a father, and a community leader, I have the experience and skills necessary to help lead our county to a prosperous future. With my real world experience, I bring new energy and commitment to a system that desperately needs to be fixed.


2. How would you implement your top priority?

Answer from Chris Monzel:

I am the only candidate that has taken the Americans for Tax Reform pledge to not raise taxes. The Monzel NO TAX pledge is that I pledge to vote against ALL tax increase and work to cut Hamilton County's already high tax rates. As an elected official, I have voted against every tax increase proposal and helped lead the successful effort to rollback Cincinnati property taxes.

Answer from David E. Grossmann:

1. Repeal the recently enacted 20% in the Ohio Sales Tax.

2. Exhort county officeholders and agencies to cooperate with a Cost Reduction Task Force comprised of private sector executives with world- class cost management expertise. Effect savings through elimination of unnecessary spending, outsourcing on non-core services, process improvement and the employment of new technology.


Responses to questions asked of each candidate are reproduced as submitted to the League.  Candidates' statements are presented as submitted. The answer must not exceed 50 words for the first question (Qualifications), and 75 words for the second (Top Priority). Direct references to opponents are not permitted.

The order of the candidates is random and changes daily.


This Contest || Home (Ballot Lookup) || About Smart Voter || Feedback
Created: May 4, 2004 14:49 PDT
Smart Voter <http://www.smartvoter.org/>
Copyright © League of Women Voters of California Education Fund.
The League of Women Voters neither supports nor opposes candidates for public office or political parties.