This is an archive of a past election.
See http://www.smartvoter.org/ca/alm/ for current information.
Alameda County, CA March 2, 2004 Election
Smart Voter

Bringing in the Public

By Ernest A. "ernie" Avellar

Candidate for Member; Alameda County Board of Education; Trustee Area 5

This information is provided by the candidate
The duties and the very existence of county offices of education are little known to the general public. Citizens must be educated about this level of the education hierarachy that exists between the local school district and the State Department of Education (CDE)
Most citizens, who have children in school, know a great deal about their local school and district, because they are intensely interested in the education of their children. They want the school to provide a sound education, and they want their local school district to spend its money well in order to facilitate good education. When their local school district does something they do not like, citizens will freqently come to meetings to present their concerns and ideas. They express their thoughts about how the money is spent; and, if they are convinced of the need, usually generously support school bonds.

A county office of education, though offering important services, is not as well known. As a result, unless parents wish to appeal a decision of their local school district about an inter-district transfer or an expulsion, they rarely ever come to a county board of education meeting.

The Alameda County Office of Education has a budget of $37 million that can be used to to help their children. But the public first has to know that this county office exists, then they have to know how to come to the county board of education and ask for help for their children.

Some of the programs carried out by the county office of education are required by law; for example, the Juvenile Court Schools. In addition, the office is required to oversee the budgets of local school districts. There is also about $11 million in grant money that is used for specific purposes.

How much of the county office of education's $37 million goes to direct service to students? Only about 25%. Here is an area in which the public can have real input. Where does the remainder go? It is used for teacher workshops, conferences, public relations, consultants. An important plank in my platform has been to re-direct more of this money to students.

More than $13 million is called "unrestricted." The law is vague as to who is responsible to determine budget priorities for this money. Is it the board, or is it the county superintendent? The Grand Jury has said that it is the board that must have the final say. The incumbent superintendent rejects that opinion.

In addtion to re-establishing the primacy of the board in the budget process, another one of my goals is to have public input into the budget and its priorities. My constiutents have made clear that they wish more of the $37 million budget go to direct service to students and less to administration.

Candidate Page || Feedback to Candidate || This Contest
March 2004 Home (Ballot Lookup) || About Smart Voter


ca/alm Created from information supplied by the candidate: February 26, 2004 15:56
Smart Voter <http://www.smartvoter.org/>
Copyright © League of Women Voters of California Education Fund.
The League of Women Voters neither supports nor opposes candidates for public office or political parties.