Contra Costa County, CA | November 2, 1999 Election |
Contra Costa Times Candidate StatementBy Thomas King "Tom" ButtCandidate for Council Member; City of Richmond | |
This information is provided by the candidate |
Answers to questions by local newspaperCANDIDATE QUESTIONNAIRE Please type and return by Sept. 3, 1999 Name: Thomas K. Butt Office sought: City Council Home address: 235 East Scenic Avenue Richmond, CA 94801 Home phone: 510/237-2084 Work Phone: 510/236-7435 E-Mail Address: tom.butt@intres.com Web site address: http://www.intres.com Occupation/employer: Architect/Interactive Resources Date and Place of Birth: 3/23/44, Albuquerque, NM Party Registration: Democrat Spouse Name: Shirley Ryland Butt Spouse Date of Birth: November 10, 1944 Spouse Occupation and Employer: Administrator/Interactive Resources Political offices you have held or run for (include dates and outcome of race): Richmond City Council, 1993. Ran 4th for three seats. Lost by 104 votes. Party registration: Democrat Spouse name and occupation: Shirley Ryland Butt, Planner and Administrator Names of other family members (first and last names, ages, dates of birth and occupations) Andrew Martin Butt, 25, June 22, 1974, Architectural Intern Daniel Ryland Butt, 23, September 14, 1976, Independent Contractor Political Offices you have held or run for (include dates and outcomes of races) 1993, ran for Richmond City Council, came in 4th for three seats, lost by 104 votes 1995, elected Richmond City Council, ran 4th for five seats Your professional/working career (include dates and positions):
Leadership Positions:
26 years Where else have you lived? Fayetteville, AR, Santa Monica, CA, Venice, CA, San Francisco, CA, Mill Valey, CA, Ft. Belvoir, VA, Ft. Polk, LA, Honolulu, HI, Saigon and Long Binh, Vietnam, Yellowstone National Park, WY, Fortine, MN, Lantana, FL Describe anything you have published, invented, discovered, painted, etc., and events or hobbies that would be interesting for a biographical story: Licenses
Manager's home phone: Manager's work phone: Campaign committee: Name: Friends of Tom Butt Address: 117 Park Place, Richmond, CA 94801 Phone: 510/236-7435 State or Federal campaign ID number: 931131 Treasurer: Ted Smith Treasurer's Address: P.O. Box 1134, El Cerrito, CA 94530 Treasurer's phone: 510/238-9655 (if more than one committee, please provide above information for each one.) Contact Information for Voters: Phone numbers: 510/236-7435, 510/237-2084 Email Address: tom.butt@intres.com We Site Address: http://www.intres.com Please list all criminal convictions or pleas: None Please list all civil court judgments against you or any business you have been involved with: Jeffrey v. Interactive Resources, 1975, for $1,000 Will you be keeping your campaign finance information on computer disk? No Would you be willing to provide us with a copy of the data disk when you file your campaign report? Not applicable RICHMOND CITY COUNCIL CANDIDATE QUESTIONNAIRE THE REPORTER COVERING THE RACE IS SHAWN MASTEN. HER TELEPHONE NUMBER IS 510/262-2725 1. The Richmond City Council has a history of divisiveness that has led citizens to question the council's credibility. What would you do to improve relations on the council and shift the focus from politics to business at hand? The dictionary definition of "politics" covers a wide range, from "the science and art of political government" to " factional scheming for power and status within a group." In the former definition of politics, there is nothing wrong with divisiveness per se, it is the embodiment of different viewpoints of the people elected officials represent. However, my perception is that on the Richmond City Council, there has generally been a split between two groups: those who represent the interests of Richmond residents and those who have a recent history of representing the special interests of industries, developers and lobbyists who have maintained the reins of power in Richmond for nearly 100 years. This kind of "divisiveness" has spawned resentments that have resulted in emotional outbursts and personal attacks. I believe the best remedy is to elect a city council that represents the people. Nevertheless, I have in the last four years, learned a few things that promote civility, which I will continue to try and practice:
I ran in both 1993 and 1995 as a reformer. Like many other residents, I didn't trust the city government either. After two years of frustration that change was not happening, I became the fifth and swing vote to terminate City Manger Floyd Johnson. This was a controversial decision that triggered a recall campaign, but I do not regret it. As a city council, our only real tool in shaping the type of management we have is the city manager we hire. The management style and corruption that was exposed throughout the latter half of 1998 and early 1999 had been ongoing for decades under the watch of at least three previous city managers. As a result of the Recreation scandal, there have been major changes in the management and accountability of departments throughout city government, but most importantly in Finance and Recreation. The entrenched bureaucracy that existed when I was elected four years ago has been substantially replaced. Notwithstanding the recreation problems, the weakest component, in my opinion, was the public works department (now public services) and the planning department. There was both a lack of vision and an inability to successfully execute ongoing projects. Both departments have new leadership with highly qualified individuals. Although I have not been fully satisfied in the way the $1million Chevron grant was spent, and I was suspicious of the source, it is clear that the money has resulted in an unprecedented review of city government organization and management studies. Richmond government has already become more efficient and more productive as a result. The one component of the study that I most advocated, a community-wide survey to measure citizen's needs and satisfactions, has not been implemented. I believe that we can never achieve the highest level of accountability until we ask our constituents to grade us regularly, and we establish benchmarks by which our performance can be measured. 3. What do you see as the top three issues facing the city today? How do you propose to address them? My overriding objective continues to be improving the quality of life in Richmond. A higher quality of life is what will draw new businesses and residents to our city, providing the economic vitality and citizen involvement that will address the causes of dissatisfaction. including relatively high crime rates, relatively low school test scores, and urban blight. A couple of millennia ago, a Roman architect named Vitruvius, wrote that a successful building design should have "firmness, commodity and delight." That is, it should be structurally strong, work well for its intended function, and be pleasing to the eye. The same could be said for a successful city. A city's infrastructure should be well-built and properly maintained; The services provided by a city should be responsive to the needs of the people; and a city should have a clean and pleasing appearance. These three objectives are also my priorities for Richmond, and whether or not we make progress in addressing them will be the most important issues for the Richmond City Council at the beginning of the third millenium. Whether we should invest in a state-of-the art sewage collection and treatment system or continue to patch it up while users are plagued with overflows and the City pays out increasing amounts in claims is already an election issue. Many citizens have already lost faith in our city's ability to abate abandoned buildings, clean up weed and trash-strewn lots, and force absentee landlords to properly maintain properties. The people want our police to pro-actively prevent crime rather than just take police reports and solve some crimes after the fact. There is a severe shortage of parks, sports facilities and playing fields for young people in parts of Richmond. Some of the specific ways that these issues will play out before the City Council include: Public-Private Partnerships for Economic Development In the next four years, the City of Richmond will be collaborating with dozens of private-sector entrepreneurs in the implementation of projects that will change the face of the city, bringing new residents and jobs to vacant or underutilized land throughout the oldest parts of Richmond. These projects include Point Molate, Terminal #1, the Ford Building, Marina Center, the Marina Bay Village Center, the BART Transit Village, and others. The professionalism with which these are handled and expedited, and the quality of the results will test both the city council and city staff, and will determine our future ability to attract other agents of change. Sophisticated Management Tools Richmond is behind many other cities in providing state of the art computer hardware and software for infrastructure management, GIS (geographic information systems), permitting and citizen complaint management and internal computer networking. Many high-level city employees are not served by email. However, all this is scheduled or major improvements in 1999-2000. The 800 megahertz public safety communication system will go on line early next year. Destination Tourism The National Park Service will be making a recommendation this month to Congress that the former Richmond Shipyards become a National Historic Site or National Historic Park with the theme "Rosie the Riveter/World War II Homefront" with the objective of becoming the premier location in the United States for interpreting the civilian contribution to the war, particularly that of women and minorities. This recognition could give Richmond an image boost that would change the city forever. Other initiatives include completion of the Bay Trail along the entire Richmond shoreline, completion of the Richmond Greenway with links at its ends to the Bay Trail and the Ohlone Greenway, restoration of Baxter (Stege) Creek and other natural creeks flowing through Richmond, and the completion of parkland acquisition, such as at Miller-Knox Regional Shoreline Park. 4. After years of decreasing crime rates, the level of violent crime appears to be on the rise in the City of Richmond again, particularly related to drug sales. How would you tackle the problem, and what do you see as the council's role in addressing drug dealing and gun-related crimes? I believe the significant drop in crime in Richmond over the last few years has been part of a national trend, largely related to an improved economy. While our crime rate has declined, it is still high in relation to overall averages, and this is substantially a result of the relatively large proportion of the Richmond population that is economically disadvantaged. In this type of environment, drug dealing, theft, illegal gun use and a low regard for human life tend to flourish among a few persons who commit most of the crimes in a few high-crime areas of the city. The statistical results, however, adversely affect everyone in the city, its image and its value and attraction to residents and businesses. The recent drop in our crime rate has, in my opinion, bred a certain amount of complacency that needs to be reversed. I would recommend the following:
I believe an effective council member fulfills several roles:
Strengths: A majority of the council tends to pull together when they have to for projects and initiatives vital to the city's future, such as the sewer district improvement plan, economic development projects like the Ford Plant, terminating an unsuccessful city manager, balancing the budget, and appropriating funding to or technical tools needed for facilities management. Most council members have worked through any previous conflicts and developed a cordial working personal relationship with each other that transcends political differences -- even though it may not be apparent on TV. Most council members work pretty hard at various aspects of city business, putting in a lot of time at meetings, special projects, research and constituent problems far beyond the 4 to 8 hours of weekly council meetings. Weaknesses: Some council members are so closely tied to the largesse of the Local 188/BMW/Darrell Reese machine that it adversely affects their ability to provide independent representation to the citizens of Richmond. Too many times, issues tied to interests represented by this machine have divided the council, inspired bitter debates and hard feelings, and precluded progressive legislative action and leadership sorely needed by the city. Far too often, some council members have hinged their support or opposition to an item based on who initiated it rather than on its merits. 8. The council recently approved a $50 million improvement to the ailing Richmond Municipal Sewer district. What do you think about that plan, and how will you ensure that the city is prudent about the way the money is spent? Proper infrastructure management has been a priority of mine since it was on my campaign platform in 1995. I take credit or discovering the dire physical and financial condition of Municipal Sewage District No. 1 and for pushing the city council to take appropriate steps to repair both. I fully support the improvement plan, and I will continue to use my technical knowledge to see that the plan is properly implemented and the money well spent. 9. The city is on the verge of an economic development boom that promises to bring thousands of new homes and businesses to the city and put Richmond on the map as a suburb as well as a destination point or visitors and tourists. How do you think the city can better address the need to improve its image along with the development boom and how would you guarantee that the millions of dollars in economic development are well spent? The image of the city is a function of primarily three things: school test scores, its physical appearance, and its crime rate. As a city council, we have little control over school test scores, although there is much we can do to collaborate with the WCCUSD to make schools more attractive, safer, and more efficient. We have a lot of control over physical appearance, including maintaining city properties, rigorous enforcement of public nuisance ordinances, and insuring quality development through high design review and permitting standards. See the answer to question 4 for crime. Finally, we can provide the leadership to implement our collective vision of Richmond: "Richmond will develop all of its neighborhoods and businesses as quality places to live, work, shop and play, with its 32 miles of shoreline as a widely-recognized symbol of the city's success." I will use my education and experience planning, design and real estate development to continue to provide a vigorous level of oversight of public economic development dollars. 10. The council recently decided to privatize the Richmond Marina, and privatization of the city's wastewater treatment plant is under consideration. What is your opinion on outsourcing, and what are its plusses and minuses? Outsourcing should only be done when there is no compelling reason to do otherwise, and even then, it should not be done without consulting and involving the affected public employee unions. Maintaining trust and good relations with the city workforce is of great importance, and degradation in the relationship between the city council and the unions could be disastrous. In the case of the Marina, I have asked that the unions be involved in reviewing the proposals, and at least one proposer has committed to offer all existing employees jobs. Privatization of the Marina became a consideration because it was the only apparent way to get out from under a huge debt service. With respect to the wastewater treatment plant, the potential advantages and disadvantages are still being developed. Contracting with a large organization with vast experience and resources is attractive, and the potential economies of scale could result in better service at lower rates. Apparently some of the private operators routinely retain the existing city employees and existing unions and offer them advancement opportunities that they would never have at a stand-alone facility. |
Candidate Page
|| Feedback to Candidate
|| This Race
November 1999 Home (Ballot Lookup)
|| About Smart Voter