State of California (Alpine, Amador, Calaveras, El Dorado, Mono, Placer, Sacramento, Tuolumne Counties) | November 3, 1998 General |
EDUCATIONBy Dan WinterrowdCandidate for United States Representative; District 4 | |
This information is provided by the candidate |
Historically speaking, we now spend, in real terms, more per pupil than ever before - then why can't Johnny read?It is O.K. by the government if Johnny can read, but the most important aspect of government education, for its sponsors, is that it produce citizens loyal to it. If Johnny gets lost in the shuffle, then the system can always come up with another "program" to address his "needs." Far from being unsuccessful, the present educational system is performing exactly as its sponsors would hope. It is churning out loyal recyclers, loyal environmentalists and rain forest experts, and loyal uncritical citizens who will see only government solutions to problems. The only slight difficulty is that the kids are not receiving the education Mom and Dad had in mind. There are of course exceptions, and many survive the government educational system with their wits, and with their critical thinking caps still attached. These are though exceptions and not the rule as the SAT scores - even when adjusted upward - readily show. The Federal government has no moral or constitutional justification for delving into the area of education. Sending our income to Washington D.C. so that the Department of Education(DOE) can funnel it back to the most politically connected has nothing to do with sound education and everything to do with furthering power in D.C. Recently, the DOE declared the Jerry Springer Show an "enriching cultural experience," and has recently spent 1.3 BILLION to close caption the Jerry Springer, Ricki Lake, and Montel Williams talk shows. We now have about 20,000 employees in the DOE disbursing tax money throughout the public schools with little say from parents and taxpayers. We have education "experts" continually force feeding their government projects on hapless local schools. With more and more Federal control comes less and less local control. The parents who should be making the decisions in their childrens' education are being pushed aside. It is time to put educational decisions back into the parents' hands. A good first step is to get the Federal government out of the education business altogether. We don't need educational decisions handed down from D.C. Parents, not bureaucrats, know what is best for their children. Parents, not bureaucrats, have the greatest incentive to see their children educated. |
Next Page:
Position Paper 3
Candidate Page
|| Feedback to Candidate
|| This Race
November 1998 Home (Ballot Lookup)
|| About Smart Voter
Created from information supplied by the candidate: September 29, 1998 23:22
Smart Voter '98 <http://www.smartvoter.org/>
Copyright © 1998
League of Women Voters of California Education Fund.
The League of Women Voters neither supports nor
opposes candidates for public office or political parties.