Smart Voter
Sacramento County, CA November 3, 1998 General
Measure M
County Retail Transactions and Use Tax
County of Sacramento

103,292 / 31.9% Yes votes ...... 220,712 / 68.1% No votes

See Also: Index of all Measures

Infomation shown below: Impartial Analysis | Arguments |
Shall the County of Sacramento, to maintain essential services such as police, sheriff and fire protection services, be authorized to increase the County sales tax by 1/4 cent for a maximum of 6 years for general governmental purposes, pro- vided that all sales tax expenditures be independently audited each year with the full audit report published in local newspapers showing how all funds are specifically spent?
Impartial Analysis from the County Counsel
If approved by voters, Measure M would add Chapter 3.44 to the Sacramento County Code, authorizing the Sacramento County Board of Supervisors to levy a retail transactions and use tax. The tax would be levied at the rate of one-quarter of one percent on the gross receipts from the retail sale of tangible personal property, and on the sales price of tangible personal property purchased from any retailer for storage, use or other consumption. Certain exemptions and exclusions would apply, as specified in detail by Section 3.44.110 of the ordinance. If approved, the tax would be levied County-wide, in both the unincorporated area and incorporated cities, for a period of six years from its operative date.

Proceeds from the tax would be allocated to the County of Sacramento and the cities of Sacramento, Folsom, Citrus Heights, Galt, and Isleton on the basis of the current monthly base sales tax allocation to each jurisdiction by the State Board of Equalization, and adjustable quarterly based on actual total quarterly allocation of base sales taxes. Revenue derived through passage of Measure M would be general purpose funds, expendable in conformity with the discretionary budget powers of the governing board of each recipient jurisdiction. Measure M also provides for establishment of an advisory committee by the Sacramento County Board of Supervisors. The advisory committee would be charged with completion of an annual audit and published report on the manner of expenditure of proceeds generated by the tax.

Measure M requires approval by a majority vote of the qualified voters of the County of Sacramento voting in the election on the issue.

 
Suggest a link related to this contest
Links to sources outside of Smart Voter are provided for information only and do not imply endorsement.

Arguments For Measure M Arguments Against Measure M
Vote Yes on Measure M to keep Sacramento's neighborhoods safe.

Measure M will ensure we keep the expanded law enforcement that has cut crime rates throughout the city and county.

Thanks to federal grants, our community-oriented policing program has put over 300 additional officers on the streets. Today, you see police and sheriff's deputies at our schools, in community services centers and working neighborhood "beats" - not just in response to 911 calls.

Crime has been cut 15% in the City of Sacramento and 6% in the county thanks to these additional officers. Related community partnerships have driven out drug dealers, cleaned up abandoned cars and neglected buildings and eliminated other nuisances that destroy property values.

But our success can't continue without Measure M. The Legislature has siphoned $110 million from local cities and the county for state operations. Over the past seven years, local officials have cut spending by $151 million and sharply curtailed many programs.

So far, we've avoided cutting law enforcement. With federal grants about to expire, however, those 300 positions may be cut.

Vote Yes on Measure M to prevent reduction of police and sheriff's services in our neighborhoods.

Vote Yes on Measure M to support fire services throughout Sacramento County.

Vote Yes on Measure M to provide a higher level of protection for at-risk children.

Vote Yes on Measure M because it protects taxpayers: It expires in six years. It tells local officials we want our money spent on public safety. It requires money to be spent where it's collected, ensuring all communities get their fair share. It requires annual publication of an independent audit of how the money is spent.

Business leaders, church and neighborhood groups, labor unions and community leaders all ask you to keep Sacramento safe. Vote Yes on Measure M.

s/Greta Cannon
Former Chair,
Sacramento County Commission on Aging

s/Roy E. Brewer
Former President,
Sacramento Metropolitan Chamber of Commerce

s/Glen Craig
Sheriff of Sacramento County

s/Shirley Johnson
President of
Colonial Park Arts and Recreation Effort

s/John McGinness
President,
Volunteers in Victim Assistance

Rebuttal to Arguments Above
The politicians who put Measure M on the ballot want you to believe that the tax increase will go for increased law enforcement. But the fact is, Measure M provides No Guarantee that any new deputies or police officers will be added to Sacramento streets, or that existing deputies and officers will not be laid off!

Measure M is a $30,000,000 tax increase for general fund spending--pure and simple.

Measure M is not needed. Existing property tax and sales tax revenues are way up and welfare spending is way down. Instead of asking for a tax increase, why doesn't government start being more efficient with the money it has?

Measure M is bad for Sacramento's economy! That's why business organizations and small business owners oppose Measure M. The negative impact on the local economy is also why the Folsom City Council passed a resolution opposing the tax.

Measure M will make Sacramento's tax the third highest in the state! Even worse, it will raise the sales tax rate in Sacramento County to 8%--a half percent higher than every other surrounding county. Businesses, and the jobs they bring to the community, will locate outside Sacramento.

Measure M does nothing to reduce government waste and mismanagement. It does nothing to reduce crime. It does nothing to improve our economy.

That's why taxpayers Oppose Measure M.

Raising taxes is not the answer! Vote No on Measure M!

s/Jonathan Coupal
Director of Legal Affairs,
Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association

s/Joe Sullivan
Executive Director,
Sacramento County Taxpayers League

s/John Biermans
Small Business Owner

s/Ted Costa
CEO,
People's Advocate Inc.

s/Felicia Elkinson
President,
Council of Sacramento Senior Organizations

Don't give the politicians a $30,000,000 blank check. They can't be trusted.

Let's look at the facts. In 1993, the politicians begged us to increase the sales tax for more law enforcement. We agreed. Proposition 172 raises over $50 Million for the county each year. Now the politicians want more. Measure M asks for yet another sales tax increase - a staggering $30 Million annually.

Where will the money go? No one knows! Measure M provides no guarantee that the money will be used for any specific program - not cops, not schools. What we do know is that the tax increase will go into local government's general funds. The politicians say that they will decide how to spend the money after the election!

Does the county need the money? No. Every government bureaucracy pleads poverty. But Sacramento County holds a multi-million dollar reserve. More important, the politicians have refused to stop illegal taxes and excess fees. In this era of surpluses (the State of California has a $4.4 billion dollar surplus), it makes no sense to raise taxes. That's why measure M is opposed by Paul Gann's Citizens Committee and Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association.

Will a tax increase hurt the Sacramento economy? Yes. If measure M passes, Sacramento County will have the third-highest tax rate in the state. More important, the tax rate will be higher than other surrounding counties, driving away some businesses and deterring new businesses from coming to Sacramento.

The Sacramento Bee calls Measure M a "flawed tax-hike proposal." Seniors oppose Measure M because sales tax increases hit seniors on fixed incomes especially hard.

Who supports Measure M? Politicians.

Remember, you have no guarantee that your higher taxes will go towards law enforcement. Measure M is a blank check with no guarantees - vote No.

s/Jonathan Coupal
Director of Legal Affairs,
Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association

s/Joe Sullivan
Executive Director,
Sacramento County Taxpayers League

s/John Biermans
Small Business Owner

s/Ted Costa
CEO,
People's Advocate Inc.

s/Felicia Elkinson
President,
Council of Sacramento Senior Organizations

Rebuttal to Arguments Above
Opponents are wrong. Money to maintain current law enforcement levels in our neighborhoods is not there.

The choice is simple.

If Measure M fails, Sacramento city and county will lose funding for 341 sheriff's deputies and police officers.

s/Arturo Venegas, Jr.
Chief of Police, City of Sacramento

s/Glen Craig
Sheriff of Sacramento County

Sacramento Home Page || Statewide Links || About Smart Voter || Feedback


Created: February 16, 1999 18:55
Smart Voter '98 <http://www.smartvoter.org/>
Copyright © 1998 League of Women Voters of California Education Fund
The League of Women Voters neither supports nor opposes candidates for public office or political parties.