Smart Voter
State of California June 2, 1998 Primary
Proposition 222
Murder. Peace Officer Victim. Sentence Credits.

Legislative Initiative Amendment. Put on the Ballot by the Legislature.

3,978,287 / 77.1% Yes votes ...... 1,188,113 / 22.9% No votes

Infomation shown below: Summary | Fiscal Impact | Yes/No Meaning | Official Information | Arguments |
Summary Prepared by the State Attorney General:
  • Amends Penal Code section 190, which provides that second degree murder of peace officer who defendant knows or should know is performing official duty, is punishable by 25 years to life in prison, to provide that such murder, if committed either intentionally, with intent to commit great bodily injury, or with personal use of a firearm or dangerous or deadly weapon, is punishable by life in prison without parole. Eliminates duplicative provision in Penal Code.
  • Persons convicted of any murder may not earn credits in prison to reduce the sentence.

Fiscal Impact from the Legislative Analyst:
* Probably minor additional state costs.

Meaning of Voting Yes/No
A YES vote of this measure means:
Persons convicted of murder would no longer be eligible to receive credits for good conduct or participation in work or education programs that reduce the time they must stay in prison. Also, a law enacted last year by the Legislature and Governor establishing a penalty of life imprisonment without possibility of parole for the second degree murder of a peace officer under certain circumstances would be replaced by a virtually identical law enacted by the voters.

A NO vote of this measure means:
Most persons convicted of murder would continue to be eligible for credits that reduce the time they stay in prison. Also, a law enacted last year by the Legislature and Governor establishing a penalty of life imprisonment without possibility of parole for the second degree murder of a peace officer under certain circumstances would not be replaced by one enacted by the voters.

Official Sources of Information
Arguments Submitted to the Secretary of State

Summary of Arguments FOR Proposition 222:
NOT PROVIDED

Summary of Arguments AGAINST Proposition 222:
NOT PROVIDED
Contact FOR Proposition 222:
NOT PROVIDED

Contact AGAINST Proposition 222:
NOT PROVIDED

  Live Election Returns

All Propositions
includes results by county (from Sec. of St.)
Nonpartisan Analysis

League of Women Voters

Other Analysis of Prop 222 See also Campaign Finance Info

Prop 222 Contributions Data from the Secretary of State

Contributions Summary for all Propositions
Suggest a link related to this contest
Links to outside sources are provided for information only and do not imply endorsement.

Home (Ballot Lookup) || State Election Links
About Smart Voter || Feedback


Created: June 17, 1998 11:14
Smart Voter '98 <http://www.smartvoter.org/>
Copyright © 1998 League of Women Voters of California, Smart Valley Inc.
The League of Women Voters neither supports nor opposes candidates for public office or political parties.